Skip to content

Why Tata Nano Failed: Indian Mother’s Point of View

October 23, 2011

Tata Nano – most awaited car in India and worldwide, placed near the wisdom shelves of Mustang and Beetle before of its launch. It was an experiment for disruptive innovation and pride of many Indians during those flamboyant press releases praising India’s Innovation. Ultimately it was a failure. Sales in November 2010 dropped by 85% from last year. And started the critics. Three main reasons came out: Tata recalling cars for installing fire safety after fire reports, waiting list and production delays, heat and sound caused by engine. It’s not new for Tata Motors Limited. Several models of Indica, another Tata Car,  were brought back to factory for safety issues in 1999-2001. Though these were some issues, I wanted to know a major reason for such a big fall. It is cheap. The equation says it has to sell.

An advertisement on television triggered a discussion in my family over lunch as it does in every Indian family. This time it was Tata Nano. My mother just spoke a sentence, deep enough to escape an early thought, ‘Tata Nano failed because of less dicky space (rumble seat).’ When an analyst is deciphering Tata Nano’s mistakes, first thing coming to anyone’s mind are big jargon words like press release on fire, waiting list, production delays, governmental issues, organizational. But it was dicky space for my mother. It gave me a strange feeling and I started to research for authentic sources and came across this HBR Blog. Both combined clicked lot to me.

Deciphering Tata Nano’s Mistakes

Matt Eyring on his HBR Blog points out three reasons of success

  1. ‘you have to conceive of something people will actually want’,
  2. ‘devise a way to produce it reliably and profitably at the price those people will pay’, and
  3. ‘communicate a clear, targeted value proposition, differentiated from competing offerings’.

This car would have replaced motorcycles according to initial reports and price comparisons. People on bicycle cannot afford Tata Nano, people on motorcycles can afford Tata Nano, and people already having cars won’t degrade as society complex is a big issue in India. This means, major chunk of probable consumers but not all will be people who have motorcycles.

In India, people upgrade from motorcycles to cars for only two reasons – safety and space (to keep luggage). Upgrading from cars to luxury cars is another issue. Now, Tata Nano failed the first part with fire reports and calling back vehicles for installation of fire safety. Let’s talk about second issue. If you happened to see a Tata Nano, you will see less of leg space (to keep some stuff beneath your seat, dicky space (to keep luggage behind car). BANG. Both the factors were at fault and a big failure to meet motorcyclists demands.

Now comes the bicyclists. Well, truth be told, India is still poor and bicyclists don’t have so much money to buy a Nano. Who was Tata aiming at?

Nevertheless of a failure, Tata performed well to task no. 2 – produce reliably and profitably. It surfaced out India’s Innovation and reaching to its stakeholders like car parts suppliers.

Bottom-line: Emerging Market is a very dicey area. You must know what people want and deliver at prices they can pay. Innovation is not only about technology, but also about adjusting to consumer needs. 

6 Comments leave one →
  1. Anirban permalink
    January 11, 2012 12:31 pm

    Nice insight but i think where Tata got the whole strategy wrong was positioning the Nano as a “poor man’s car”. Society is still a big complex in India and nobody wants to be seen as the one with the cheapest car because he couldnt afford a costlier one.

    • raj permalink
      December 8, 2012 4:29 pm

      This is the biggest reason why nano failed in India and the reason why I do not want to buy it…..

  2. Kanav Hasija permalink*
    January 11, 2012 12:38 pm

    Thanks for the comment Anirban. You are right on that part, at least in India. Marketing was a big issue and a well discussed one. I wanted to portray technology issue in disruptive innovations rather than a marketing one. That’s why you are now seeing ads of Tata Nano as ‘Nano 2012’ (trying to remove image of the old Nano) and no mention of ‘cheapest car’.

  3. March 5, 2012 7:54 pm

    Thank god nano failed. Our Roads already have the maximum number of vehicles per sq/km. 1000s die every day due to accidents. There is 0 parking space as every Business makes use of Parking space also for setting up shops. NO sidewalks as they are taken by hawkers. Nano sucsess would be like cutting the last vein.
    Ratan Tata and others like him just want to sell something and make money with no regards for the above problems. I would have praised him if he used all the innovation man hours and made cycles that run on charged batteries or some solar power.

  4. May 25, 2012 12:13 pm

    I believe that you have not had a chance to get in a Nano, otherwise, you would not claim that there is less leg space. In Tata Nano, at both rows, there are ample leg space. Even you can carry 2 small bags at the back of front seats. Second thing, there is a small storage space behind the last seat bench in which one can put two average sized bags. Pls correct those outcomes in your article.

  5. vij permalink
    July 26, 2012 8:08 pm

    TATA is a company which flurished and became cash rich in the license raj of Socialistic congress controlled India. TATA does not know the word innovation, it still chruns 1945 Mercedes truck chaises for commercial vehicle.s. Unfortunately for them times have changed and the average customer does not want socialistic bread and butter, I would rather buy Suzuki Alto than glorified tuk tuk

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: